Stop Recruiting More People to Fix Broken Hiring
- Mike Bratby-Bale
- Mar 23
- 2 min read
Most organisations don’t have a talent problem.

They have a hiring system problem.
More recruiters won’t fix it. A full-time Head of Recruitment won’t fix it either, not on their own.
Because if the system is unclear, inconsistent, or overloaded with friction, all you do is scale the problem.
This is where fractional recruitment leadership earns its place .
Not as a cheaper alternative. As a more precise one.
Why Fractional Recruitment Leadership Works
You don’t need senior leadership all the time.
You need it at the moments where it actually changes outcomes.
Hiring slows for no clear reason
Strong candidates drop out late
“Good” means different things to different people
The process feels busy, but not effective
That’s where I step in.
Not to “support recruitment”
To diagnose, redesign, and stabilise the system behind it
What Actually Changes
This isn’t about filling roles faster.
It’s about making hiring work properly.
1) Clarity
Most hiring problems start here.
Unclear role definition.Inconsistent expectations. Different people hiring for different things.
Fix this, and everything downstream improves.
2) System Design
Hiring should not rely on individual effort.
It should run as a repeatable, structured system.
Defined stages
Consistent assessment
Clear ownership
Visible progress
No chaos. No guesswork.
3) Decision Quality
Hiring decisions are often slow or wrong for the same reason.
Lack of alignment.
I bring structure to how decisions are made so you stop second guessing, stop reopening roles, and stop losing good people late in the process.
4) Capability
If you have a team, I don’t replace them.
I level them up.
Sharper screening
Better interviews
Stronger hiring conversations
More confidence in decision making
The result is a team that can deliver without constant oversight.
5) Friction Removal
This is the hidden one.
Delays. Drop-offs. Confusion. Too many steps. No clear ownership.
This is what actually slows hiring down.
Fix the friction, and outcomes improve quickly without adding pressure or headcount.
Where This Works Best
This approach is built for organisations that are:
Growing quickly but hiring inconsistently
Scaling without a clear hiring framework
Relying too heavily on agencies
Experiencing drop-off or poor hiring outcomes
Unsure where the real problem sits
You don’t need more activity.
You need a system that works under pressure.
What You Get
Not advice. Not theory.
You get applied leadership focused on outcomes:
Clear diagnosis of what’s actually broken
Practical redesign of your hiring system
Alignment across leadership and hiring managers
A team that knows how to execute properly
Measurable improvement in hiring quality and consistency
All without committing to a full-time leadership hire you may not need long term.
Final Thought
Most organisations try to fix hiring by doing more.
More roles. More recruiters. More tools. More process.
Very few stop and ask:
Does our hiring system actually work?
That’s the question that changes everything.
If you want to answer it properly:




Comments